DBA Fund II - Any DUMPS available?

[Vipassana]

Originally posted by pando
well because probably he is the only one who has said officially he works for Oracle on this forum

What is your problem bud? I fail to see a reason for the parody. If you have any doubts that I work for Oracle (and for others too who has a speck of suspision), I can prove that I work for Oracle. Do you want me to? Let me know...

[Vipassana]

Originally posted by stecal
Are you clueless, or what? Does this site look like a brain dump/cheat sheet site? Lots of people are willing to help answer real questions. Your question ("Where can I get dumps?") is not one of of them. Oracle employee? You can't be serious. Then again, maybe you are.

Whats ur problem man? Either you have the dumps are you don't. Behave matured.

[Vipassana]

Originally posted by marist89
pando has probably crossed paths with Vipassana before and put them on his s&#t list.

...and I've added you to my s$#t list

BTW, when did you become a spokesman for Pando

[DaPi]

Originally posted by Vipassana
I would like to know if anyone here has those dunps purchased and that it would be great if they can share them.

If you have any doubts that I work for Oracle (and for others too who has a speck of suspision), I can prove that I work for Oracle. Do you want me to? Let me know...

So I understand the situation to be:
Oracle Corp is too mean to purchase these things and an Oracle employee is actively inciting others to breach copyright law.

Hmmmmmmm . . . . I hope I'm wrong.

[pando]

Originally posted by Vipassana
What is your problem bud? I fail to see a reason for the parody. If you have any doubts that I work for Oracle (and for others too who has a speck of suspision), I can prove that I work for Oracle. Do you want me to? Let me know...

No problme here, I said that´s why I remember who is who

Considering the resources you have in web iv I wonder why you spend days asking on a forum

[Vipassana]

Originally posted by pando
Considering the resources you have in web iv I wonder why you spend days asking on a forum

Sources are sources Sir. Many times, tricky Qs (for instance that appear in OCP) would not be answered in Sources of Oracle Doc directly. It may take more time sometimes to dig the info throu docs than get an answer who already has. Could be many other reasons. Whats imp to understand here is, saving time is saving money

Manytimes it saves time when someone answers the Q straight; but Most times as you said, we may end up spending days and wasting time becoz of "immatured so-called jokes" that is being passed by (specially the big guys here)

A lot of time can be saved infact if ppl just mind their business and not pass sarcastic comments (examples are on fire with this thread) !!!!

[DaPi]

Originally posted by Vipassana
Whats imp to understand here is, saving time is saving money

. .. and saving money by resorting to piracy?

[Vipassana]

Originally posted by DaPi
. .. and saving money by resorting to piracy?

Piracy acts are limited to "commercial business". Sharing is not breaching the policy. In that perspective, according to you even taking "photo copies" from any material is piracy. In your eye then everyone has breached the policy and have violated the act in some form or the other.

Brother, piracy acts come into law only when you do business out of it. For instance if someone resells the dumps to me, thats a violation. Get the records clear.

[DaPi]

Originally posted by Vipassana
Sharing is not breaching the policy.

So a company that purchases one copy of MS Office and shares it with 1'000 employees is within the law?

Originally posted by Vipassana
In that perspective, according to you even taking "photo copies" from any material is piracy. In your eye then everyone has breached the policy and have violated the act in some form or the other.

YES. I'd say any copy taken with the intent of avoiding the cost of purchase or payment of royalties is illegal.

[Vipassana]

Originally posted by DaPi
So a company that purchases one copy of MS Office and shares it with 1'000 employees is within the law?

There's a clear intent for "commerical business" seen here, becoz the company is afterall using those shared copies for their business. This is violation. Can you relate that logic here for sharing a dump with a friend who does not have any commerical essence to do business out of it?

Originally posted by DaPi
YES. I'd say any copy taken with the intent of avoiding the cost of purchase or payment of royalties is illegal.

That way you can't show a single person who not violated. Don't tell me you have never taken photocopies from reference books or any book for that matter (and we know all published books say that photo copying is prohibited).

Besides, to this extent, I don't have any guilt, becoz I know I am not misusing this for a commercial venture.