thats why you mirror disks, so that doesnt happenQuote:
Originally Posted by yxez
Printable View
thats why you mirror disks, so that doesnt happenQuote:
Originally Posted by yxez
hmmnn...let me think...
I really dont trust mirroring that much....I just felt something will still
go wrong with it. And besides u only get 50% space of it while the
other is 100%
give up with you
'dont trust it' what experience do you have - none
Quote:
Originally Posted by davey23uk
The intension is there Davey, but the plan just don't seem right.
If I'm worry for my Oracle Home being corrupted during upgrade for example, I usually backup the whole ORACLE_HOME/ORACLE_BASE.
And this is mandatory anyway for backup maintenance at least once a year or every upgrade.
Anyway I have 1 server with 4 different versions/Release, so 4 diff ORACLE_HOMES, and 1 Oracle_home have 4 instance. So, its all about requirements. fyi. this is development.
my hero :) ....oissst yung email ko sagotin mo
I simply cannot believe it... Heres me spec'ing and expensive striped and mirrored configuration for my databases only to find that I don't need to because "I can't trust mirroring" and "disks are cheap anyway". Damn me and my expensive yet highly resilient disk configuration.
yeah...u can save those 50GB if u have 100GB mirrored one :)
and besides, Oracle wont be developing recovery tools if they dont
foresee or guarranteed disk crashes to happen.
gee whizz, what would you rather do - not have to do any recovery at all, or get in a panic when you lose a disk and you have downtime for ages while you get everything backup and working again
You know what, most people dont have to do restores from backups because of media failure - becuase they have protected themselves to have as little downtime as possible.
Most restores are done becuase people have meesed up and broken something.
Just stop posting rubbish, stop it stop it stop it!!!
Thanks for digging up a 10 month old thread. After 10 months you still haven't implemented?