Quote Originally Posted by tamilselvan
If the digits col is used for storing the telephone number, then REVERSE KEY INDEX will help to retrive the row fast. When the user enters full digits for a telephone number, then this will work.
But why a *REVERSE KEY* index? Why not an ordinar B*Tree index? You say: "When the user enters full digits for a telephone number, then reverse key index will help to retrive the row fast". But if the same index was made as a normal one (i.e. non-reverse key), then the row retrival will be even faster, no question about that. So my question remains: Why *REVERSE KEY* index? It doesn't make sence at all in the context of the original question.