Pando:

I used to think the OCP exams were a waste of time. Like most experienced people my main problem was a fear of failing and what that said about me as a DBA. Eventually I took 2 weeks off work to revise and sit the Oracle7.3 OCP exams. That was a very interesting 2 weeks. I passed the exams but I realised I was very experienced in a limited range on skills. The OCP exams opened my eyes to the bigger picture.

Since then I've used the OCP exams as a way of keeping on top of the new features. I think the OCP syllabus is one of the best measures of how well you've understood what the new versions have to offer.

The reason for this brief life history? I think this is where the OCP has value. I think all DBAs, regardless of experience, would learn something by becoming certified. It's very easy for a DBA to stagnate. The OCP track adds some structure to your study of Oracle and stops you avoiding areas.

I don't think paper OCPs make the certification worth less. It's like any exam, it shows a minimum level of understanding. It would be foolish to consider any exam as a substitute for experience. All professional careers require a combination of academic qualifications and experience. The OCP is only one component of a complete DBA.

Remember, it's just my opinion.

Cheers