DBAsupport.com Forums - Powered by vBulletin
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 9.2.0.4 upgrade - new Oracle Home?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Keene, NH
    Posts
    510

    9.2.0.4 upgrade - new Oracle Home?

    I will be upgrading my production database from 9.2.0.1 to 9.2.0.4 Saturday night. I will have plenty of B/Us.

    Do you recommend creating a new Oracle home for the 9.2.0.4 binaries or just upgrade the current Oracle home ? I can always reinstall 9.2.0.1 and go back from a cold backup.

    Here is my experience - I did not create a new Oracle home for any of these:
    1. Development upgraded very easily
    2. QA was a nightmare due to a corrupt JVM..
    3. Eventually I cloned production into QA and then the upgrade went very smoothly (this gives me big confidence that the prod upgrade will work).

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,187
    I've never created a new home for a patchset which is really not an upgrade, nontheless I always backups the binaries and registry
    I'm stmontgo and I approve of this message

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    greenwich.ct.us
    Posts
    9,092
    I ALWAYS install into a new $OH and apply the patches to the new $OH.
    Jeff Hunter

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,187
    Originally posted by marist89
    I ALWAYS install into a new $OH and apply the patches to the new $OH.
    why so? do you mean you could end up with an oracle home for 92020, 92030, 92040,92050 etc
    I'm stmontgo and I approve of this message

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    greenwich.ct.us
    Posts
    9,092
    Originally posted by stmontgo
    why so? do you mean you could end up with an oracle home for 92020, 92030, 92040,92050 etc
    In theory, sure. However, once I've patched 9.2.0.4 to 9.2.0.5, I un-install 9.2.0.4. While I'm upgrading, I have two $OH, but while everything is on the same version, I have one $OH.

    I run a lot of machines with multiple databases. (I know, I know, and TKyte agrees with you. It works for my environment.) If these databases are down for more than about 2 hours on the weekend, all heck breaks loose. I use multiple $OH for a couple reasons:
    1. I can install and patch the software during the week. This will cut about 30 minutes off my upgrade time. Also, since I have to install with a GUI, I can't do it remotely over dial-up.
    2. When I'm upgrading, I don't have to upgrade every database on the host at the same time. While this may spread my upgrade over several weekends, it still keeps the database down for less than 2 hours.
    3. My rollback plan is simple, shutdown the existing database, switch the $OH, startup, rerun the catalog scripts. If something goes wrong in the upgrade, I can still have the DB up in 2 hours.
    4. Since all the GUI work is done, I can run the upgrade over dial-up. While this has nothing to do with my 2-hour window, it saves me the 2.5 hours of commuting back and forth to the office for an hour's worth of work.
    Jeff Hunter

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Keene, NH
    Posts
    510
    Originally posted by marist89

    My rollback plan is simple, shutdown the existing database, switch the $OH, startup, rerun the catalog scripts. If something goes wrong in the upgrade, I can still have the DB up in 2 hours.
    Interesting...rather than restore from a cold backup

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width