DBAsupport.com Forums - Powered by vBulletin
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Archivelog mode - performance problems anyone??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    807

    Archivelog mode - performance problems anyone??

    Has anyone out there experienced any performance problems solely by putting a database in an archivelog mode? I'd like you to share your thoughts and suggestions on what to watch out for. (buffer sizes and the like..)

    I have a 800G database that has 25 log groups (200M each, 1 member/group). During peak periods, it switches about 25-30 redo logs per minute. (Yes, I've seen it happen). I'm not sure if adding more members will entirely help the cause..not that I have a whole lot of disk to spare.

    Yes - I'm aware of the database hanging if there isn't enough space in the archlog dir and the fact that archivers sometimes can't cope with the speed of log switches. The latter causes a hang as well. Besides these 2 obvious things, please post if you have anything more to share.
    Last edited by Axr2; 04-29-2004 at 04:59 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    greenwich.ct.us
    Posts
    9,092
    During peak periods, my 128M logs switch every 2-3 minutes. I have multiple archivers setup to a very fast filesystem. I constantly monitor the log_archive_dest and do an archivelog backup & purge when it gets to 80% full or every X hours, whichever comes first. I have never had a performance problem with archivelog mode.
    Jeff Hunter

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    807
    Had a typo in there..the logfiles aren't 20M, but 200M!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Geneva Switzerland
    Posts
    3,142
    Let's get this straight - you're generating 100MB of redo PER SECOND ?!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    807
    Jeff - Thanks. Yeah, the LOG_ARCHIVE_MAX_PROCESSES is currently set to 2. I assume Oracle will automatically spawn more ARCn processes if the load on the default ARC0,ARC1 processes increases dramatically. Correct?

    Given a choice would you place your logfiles or your archlogfiles to the fast file system. I would assume the former. In your case, I guess you have multiple fast disks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    807
    DaPi - yes. I have a new incarnation of the database, else wd've posted contents from v$log_history.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    INDIA
    Posts
    96
    Performance is not a problem for Machine with multiple CPU and Faster Disks. Benifit of Archivelog is known to all. Please put Online redo logs and Archivelog on separate disks to minimize I/O contention.
    Dilip Patel
    OCP 8i

    Catch me online at Yahoo: ddpatel256

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    india
    Posts
    175

    Re: Archivelog mode - performance problems anyone??

    Originally posted by Axr2
    I have a 800G database that has 25 log groups (200M each, 1 member/group). During peak periods, it switches about 25-30 redo logs per minute. (Yes, I've seen it happen). I'm not sure if adding more members will entirely help the cause..not that I have a whole lot of disk to spare.
    You have 1 log member per group.
    Moreover, why don't you multiplex your log files?

    -Raja

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    ATLANTA, GA, USA
    Posts
    3,135
    Are the disks in which archived files are stored stripped?

    The file system is on 8-Way stripped disks using 4 MB Meta volume at the hardware level.
    My redo log file size is 500m, and I can able to write 1.5 GB ( 3 archived files) in 1 Min. The entire disk array size is 27 TB. And the array has 32 GB cache.

    Tamil

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Posts
    405
    axr,

    man, you are enjoying.. with such a huge environment. I wish I could work there..

    increasing the log file size may help you. We have done it. One of our oracle apps env. used to switch 3-5 log files of size 30m each every minute during peak hours.. we increased the logfile size to 100m and it helped us.

    one more tip you can follow. make sure that your arcive log destination does not contain any other files as this can avoid fragmentation of disk and help the performance.
    -nagarjuna

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width