DBAsupport.com Forums - Powered by vBulletin
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Why does Oracle require you to define the maximum size of a varchar2, if a
    varchar2(10) and a varchar2(4000) both use the same amount of memory to
    store a given string? Is it merely for type checking, i.e., to give an
    automatic error if you try to store something longer than you expected? Or
    could there be some advantage to declaring a varchar2(10) rather than a

    Question given to me by developer.

    Oracle DBA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2000

    I don't think there is any advantage to specifying varchar2(10) as opposed to varchar2(50) storage-wise. Like you said, it's just to limit the amount of charachters that the field will accept.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width

We have made updates to our Privacy Policy to reflect the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation.