hi folks
what is the advantage of specifying 'alter tablespace begin backup'.
and then taking physical backup
Even if i don't specify this and take a physical backup of the datafile,
i will be able to recover the datafile.
Could anybody guide me the advantages of hot bacup
Originally posted by Sonia hi folks
what is the advantage of specifying 'alter tablespace begin backup'.
and then taking physical backup
Even if i don't specify this and take a physical backup of the datafile,
i will be able to recover the datafile.
Could anybody guide me the advantages of hot bacup
Hi,
when you switch a tablespace in HotBackup-Mode Oracle not only writes Block-changes to the log, but even whole modified ORacle-Blocks;
Why?
If your Oracle-block would greater than yours OS-Block it coild be happen that your backup-tool reads for example the half Oracle-block, when it tires to rad the next then it ( the Oracle-block ) could be changed. You have backuped an inconsistent Oracle-Block.
Due to HotBackup-Mode Oracle can complete tht Blocks data totally due to the block-wise logging.
The best Method to backup is with rman :
* No HotBackup-Mode
* Smaller Backup-files
* Blockconsitsency-check while backing up
* incremental Backups
* intelligent support due to repository when you recover the db
Sonia,
You may also find it helpful to use the I/O rate throttling feature of RMAN. This way you can limit the I/O rate in case you have to due a backup during times when the server is in use by many users. I use this technique in scripts which backup archivelog files separately from full database backups because this might have to occur during the daytime. Here is a link to an example script:
Bookmarks