-
Hi Team,
any comments why i might get this error?
thanks
Jigar
ARC0: Beginning to archive log# 1 seq# 290
********ARC0: Failed to archive log# 1 seq# 290
ARC0: Beginning to archive log# 2 seq# 291
Wed Jul 25 21:03:09 2001
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 292
Current log# 3 seq# 292 mem# 0: /psc1ora01/ORACLEDATA/psc1/RDO3.log
Current log# 3 seq# 292 mem# 1: /psc1ora02/ORACLEDATA/psc1/RDO3.log
Wed Jul 25 21:03:09 2001
ARC1: Completed archiving log# 1 seq# 290
ARC1: Beginning to archive log# 2 seq# 291
**********ARC1: Failed to archive log# 2 seq# 291
"High Salaries = Happiness = Project Success."
-
Is your archived log destination full?
Jurij Modic
ASCII a stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
24 hours in a day .... 24 beer in a case .... coincidence?
-
The mounpoint is never full because my rman hotbackup cleansup the mounts daily.
"High Salaries = Happiness = Project Success."
-
i got some similar error recently.
can somebody help us?
guru is on the way!!!!
-
is that possible that my machine is io boundary ,
so i get that error?
guru is on the way!!!!
-
There are many reasons why Archive process failed to archive log file:
1 REDO LOG may be small, so that frequent switch occurs. When ARCH works slowly and LGWR writes fast, this error may appear. Solution is: increase the size of the REDO LOG.
2 If the REDO files are mirrored (duplexed) and they are kept in RAID, then also ARCH process will fail because when one of the REDO Log is filled, Oracle instructs ARCH process to start archive. Immediatley, ARCH process tries to read the 2nd member of the REDO LOG file, which is not yet written (completed) by the DISK controller. Hence, ARCH process fails. To over come, do not keep the redo log files in RAID DISK ARRAYS, keep them non-mirrored (striped ) disk.
3.Avoid both SW level and HW level mirroring of redo log files. One level of mirroring is sufficient for operating a database.
4 If the you operate a VLDB and there are more than 40 disks in the disk array system, keep atleast 6 disks for REDO alone. The rest 34 can be configured for RAID 1+0 or RAID 5.
[Edited by tamilselvan on 08-08-2001 at 03:04 PM]
-
jigar mein tane email kari che
Best Regards,
Harsh Shah
-
Originally posted by hbk_emp
jigar mein tane email kari che
Most definitely! ( I think, anyway... )
Jeff Hunter
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|