1.I have tables BR_Header and BR_details wherein I have
composite Primary key(company_code,Br_NO) belonging to
BR_Header Table and Foreign key(company_code,Br_NO) belonging to BR_details table.Where BR means Bank Receipts.
Now whenever I define foreign Key constraints on BR_details table as Foreign Key(Br_NO),error message flashes saying that no unique or primary key match found.
On the other hand,Composite Foreign Key(company_code,Br_NO) is accepted and says TABLE ALTERED.
Why Oracle doesn't accept constraint Foreign key(Br_NO) defined on Br_details Table compared to constraint Primary Key(company_code,Br_NO).
P.S:On the Br_details Tables,Composite primary Key(Company_code,Br_NO) is also defined wherein the purpose is to define constraint Foreign Key(Br_NO) on the BR_details Table referencing Constraint Primary Key(Company_Code,Br_No)!
I'm not sure I fully understand the question. It's like asking why a numeric field cannot accept characters.
If table1 has a PK Col1, Col2 - Table2 cannot have an FK to only Col2. It wouldn't make any sense to do that. I'm not sure what you would expect it to do, but it is not allowed because it would simply be wrong.
An FK must point to the entire PK - that's the law
Why is the PK of BR_Header composite anyway? It would seem as if BR_No would be unique for the receipt, no?
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width