Let's get the controversey going again, I'll start!

Quote:

---

Originally posted by gandolf989
Ok then when do we invade North Korea? :confused:
There is no worse dictator today then Kim Jung Il.

---

They are next on the hit list quiz kid!!

THAT IS WHY YOU MUST ALL VOTE FOR BUSH!!!
4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!4 more years!

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr.Hanky
They are next on the hit list quiz kid!!

THAT IS WHY YOU MUST NOT VOTE FOR BUSH!!!
NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!NO more years!

---

If we were to invade countries based on which countries are more dangerous, we should have invaded North Korea first. If the list is based on what the Bushies think that they can get away with, the I can understand why Iraq was at the top of their list.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by gandolf989
If we were to invade countries based on which countries are more dangerous, . . .

---

. . . based on this criterion, I'm starting a coalition to take on the USA.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by gandolf989
If we were to invade countries based on which countries are more dangerous, we should have invaded North Korea first. If the list is based on what the Bushies think that they can get away with, the I can understand why Iraq was at the top of their list.

---

Brilliant, absolutely stunningly BRILLIANT!!
I can’t figure out why you are not president.


:D

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr.Hanky
Brilliant, absolutely stunningly BRILLIANT!!
I can’t figure out why you are not president.

:D

---

I really appreciate you write in vote for President. :D

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DaPi
. . . based on this criterion, I'm starting a coalition to take on the USA.

---

We really do have the most weapons of mass destruction.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr.Hanky
Cruser, please stop the cliche's, do you think liberating 25 million people from a ruthless, murdering, raping, torturing dictator that used chemical weapons ON HIS OWN PEOPLE was perhaps a good thing?

---

Let me ask a simple question then ... how much would you have been willing to spend personally on seeing the Iraqi people liberated? Let's have a simple number of dollars from you.

$1, but I'd pay ten to see the whole place nuked to the high heavens.
$20, if you throw in Afghanistan.
$30, if you had all the liberals protesting there at the same time.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr.Hanky
$1, but I'd pay ten to see the whole place nuked to the high heavens.
$20, if you throw in Afghanistan.
$30, if you had all the liberals protesting there at the same time.

---

Hmm, well you paid about $800, dividing $200 billion by 250 million people. Of course, if you just divide it by tax payers you can easily double that. Still think it was worth it?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by slimdave
Hmm, well you paid about $800, dividing $200 billion by 250 million people. Of course, if you just divide it by tax payers you can easily double that. Still think it was worth it?

---

There you go again, using false numbers to support your claim. $200 billion is way off. 250 million people is way off. Using your math, the cost is $400 over two budget years, or $200/yr. Care to do the math on things like Welfare, Social Security (welfare for old people) and any other social entitlement programs? Just because it's "not worth it" to you doesn't mean it's "not worth it" for the general population of the country.

I wonder if the 3000 families from 9/11 think it's a good deal?